Paradoxes of Zeno | Definition & Facts (2023)

See all related content →

(Video) The Paradoxes of ZENO _ Eleatic School of early Greek Philosophy _ यूनानी दर्शन _ Dr HS Sinha
(Video) What Are ZENO'S PARADOXES? Ancient Greek Philosophy Explained Simply

paradoxes of Zeno, statements made by the Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea, a 5th-century-bce disciple of Parmenides, a fellow Eleatic, designed to show that any assertion opposite to the monistic teaching of Parmenides leads to contradiction and absurdity. Parmenides had argued from reason alone that the assertion that only Being is leads to the conclusions that Being (or all that there is) is (1) one and (2) motionless. The opposite assertions, then, would be that instead of only the One Being, many real entities in fact are, and that they are in motion (or could be). Zeno thus wished to reduce to absurdity the two claims, (1) that the many are and (2) that motion is.

(Video) Zeno's Paradox

Plato’s dialogue, the Parmenides, is the best source for Zeno’s general intention, and Plato’s account is confirmed by other ancient authors. Plato referred only to the problem of the many, and he did not provide details. Aristotle, on the other hand, gave capsule statements of Zeno’s arguments on motion; and these, the famous and controversial paradoxes, generally go by names extracted from Aristotle’s account: the Achilles (or Achilles and the tortoise), the dichotomy, the arrow, and the stadium.

Paradoxes of Zeno | Definition & Facts (1)

More From Britannica

Eleaticism: The paradoxes of Zeno

(Video) Zeno's Paradox in Hindi | Dichotomy Paradox | Archilles and the Tortoise Paradox | हिन्दी में

(Video) the five kinds of paradox

The Achilles paradox is designed to prove that the slower mover will never be passed by the swifter in a race. The dichotomy paradox is designed to prove that an object never reaches the end. Any moving object must reach halfway on a course before it reaches the end; and because there are an infinite number of halfway points, a moving object never reaches the end in a finite time. The arrow paradox endeavours to prove that a moving object is actually at rest. The stadium paradox tries to prove that, of two sets of objects traveling at the same velocity, one will travel twice as far as the other in the same time.

If, in each case, the conclusion seems necessary but absurd, it serves to bring the premise (that motion exists or is real) into disrepute, and it suggests that the contradictory premise, that motion does not exist, is true; and indeed, the reality of motion is precisely what Parmenides denied.

(Video) Zeno's Paradoxes and Mathematics - Ep. 3.7: The instant of change

The Editors of Encyclopaedia BritannicaThis article was most recently revised and updated by Adam Augustyn.


1. Zeno's Paradoxes and Mathematics - Ep. 3.7: The instant of change
(UFBA Philosophy Lectures)
2. The Race Course -the paradoxes of motion - Zeno of Elea -Philosophy
3. Zeno's Paradoxes and Mathematics - Ep. 3.4: The Russellian account of motion
(UFBA Philosophy Lectures)
4. Zeno's Paradox: The Never-Ending Road Trip
(The Mathmagic Show)
5. Zeno's Paradox Explained in Tamil | Science Look
6. Strange Paradoxes in Maths │ The History of Mathematics with Luc de Brabandère
(What makes it tick?)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Kelle Weber

Last Updated: 04/06/2023

Views: 6197

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (73 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kelle Weber

Birthday: 2000-08-05

Address: 6796 Juan Square, Markfort, MN 58988

Phone: +8215934114615

Job: Hospitality Director

Hobby: tabletop games, Foreign language learning, Leather crafting, Horseback riding, Swimming, Knapping, Handball

Introduction: My name is Kelle Weber, I am a magnificent, enchanting, fair, joyous, light, determined, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.