Here’s a bold prediction: England could dominate the Ashes series with surprising ease—but only if Ben Stokes remains at the helm for every Test match. Former England batter Mark Ramprakash is convinced that Stokes’ presence is the linchpin to England’s success, and here’s why this statement is more than just wishful thinking. But here’s where it gets controversial: Is Stokes’ leadership truly the deciding factor, or are we underestimating Australia’s resilience? Let’s dive in.
The Ashes series kicks off this Friday in Perth, with England aiming to reclaim the urn on Australian soil for the first time since the 2010-11 season. Stokes, fresh off a shoulder injury recovery, has been a pivotal yet fragile asset, missing matches in England’s last three series due to various injuries. Yet, Ramprakash, who worked closely with Stokes during his tenure as England’s batting coach, emphasizes not just his on-field prowess but his unique ability to unite and inspire the team.
And this is the part most people miss: It’s not just about Stokes’ all-round skills; it’s his leadership and empathy that set him apart. Ramprakash highlights, ‘He seems to really connect with his teammates. He understands the pressures of international cricket and offers unwavering support, navigating the highs and lows with remarkable empathy.’ This emotional intelligence, Ramprakash argues, creates a balanced and motivated squad.
Stokes’ absence was felt keenly in the fifth Test against India last summer, where England lost, resulting in a 2-2 series draw. Similarly, injuries sidelined him in Pakistan and New Zealand, underscoring his irreplaceable role. As Ramprakash puts it, ‘When he’s not there to make those critical decisions—when to back the bowlers, when to attack—it leaves a massive void.’
Here’s the kicker: Ramprakash boldly declares, ‘If Ben Stokes plays all five Tests, England will win—and win comfortably.’ But is this confidence justified, or is it overlooking Australia’s home advantage and fighting spirit? The debate is ripe for discussion.
Meanwhile, Stokes has become a target for the Australian media, with one outlet labeling him ‘England’s Cocky Captain Complainer.’ Photos of him golfing earlier this week further fueled skepticism about England’s preparation. However, Western Australian coach Ryan Campbell dismissed the criticism, calling it misplaced. ‘I got a bit shirty about it,’ Campbell admitted. ‘Ben Stokes and Joe Root are the calmest under pressure—they’re not the ones you should be targeting.’
Stokes’ Ashes legacy is already storied, from his century in Perth during the 2013-14 tour to his legendary match-winning knock at Headingley in 2019. Teammate Jack Leach recalled Stokes’ determination during that iconic innings: ‘[David] Warner was sledging him, but Ben said, ‘I’m not walking off until we win.’ And he delivered.’
But here’s a thought-provoking question: While Stokes’ heroics are undeniable, is England’s success solely dependent on him? Joe Root, for instance, enters the series with a point to prove, having never scored a century in Australia. As Leach noted, ‘He’s motivated, and he’s coming in with a lot to prove.’
So, as the Ashes begin, the spotlight is on Stokes—but should it be? Is England’s fate truly in his hands, or is this series a more balanced contest than Ramprakash suggests? Let us know your thoughts in the comments—this debate is far from over.
